This article was originally distributed via PRWeb. PRWeb, WorldNow and this Site make no warranties or representations in connection therewith.
SOURCE: Anapol Schwartz
The multi-district metal-on-metal hip lawsuit has been moved to a District court in Indiana which places increased importance upon competent jury selection according to metal-on-metal hip lawyer Tom Anapol of the personal injury law firm Anapol Schwartz in Philadelphia.
Philadelphia, PA (PRWEB) October 09, 2012
Multidistrict litigation (MDL) against Biomet Inc. for its alleged metal-on-metal hip replacement failure will be moved to the Northern District of Indiana, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation decided Tuesday. The move was intended to improve accessibility to documents and witnesses by virtue of the close proximity to Biomet headquarters.
The federal judicial panel, which formed MDL for four other metal-on-metal hip implants, sent cases about Biomet’s M2a Magnum hip implants to Judge Robert L. Miller Jr. The panel decided to centralize the litigation, “In re: Biomet M2A Magnum Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL number 2391,” because the lawsuits share similar factual questions about the design, marketing, manufacturing and performance of the device, as well as the possible cause of Biomet’s hip implant failure.
Thomas Anapol of the law firm Anapol Schwartz agrees the chosen location will make some aspects of the trial more convenient because of the company’s nearby headquarters. However, the familiarity of the company to the local population will make highly-skilled jury selection a top priority. “We have to look at everything very carefully,” Anapol said. “This is our clients’ one chance at getting their lives back on track. We’re leaving nothing to chance.”
Anapol went on to explain that jury selection is possibly the most important component of personal injury trials such as with hip implant lawsuits. Having a good understanding of jurors’ motivation to take one side or the other is essential to obtaining a favorable verdict. Anapol's goal for jury selection is to choose unbiased jurors who will consider all the important factors in a case.
The attorneys at Anapol Schwartz are confident that their combined experience of trying medical device cases will produce an acceptable jury, regardless of the case’s proximity to Biomet.
Founded in 1977, Anapol Schwartz is a civil justice law firm with 20 attorneys and law offices in Philadelphia, and Harrisburg, PA., Cherry Hill, N.J., and Scottsdale, AZ. The firm has represented clients in numerous personal injury matters, such as defective medical devices, dangerous drugs and medical negligence.
For the original version on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/prweb2012/10/prweb9990173.htm